Another scanner.Another queue
Most AppSec tools are optimized for issue vulnerabilities - not for fitting into a developer platform without creating manual triage queues. Hyrax is built to close issues, not generate dashboard items.
- One GitHub App installation - no per-tool webhook configuration.
Security tooling that doesn't fit your platform architecture
Security scan issues block pipelines without a path to resolution.
Organizations using automated AppSec tooling spend 50% less time on manual scan review when remediation is integrated. Teams without automated remediation spend the majority of AppSec time on manual triage and ticket management.
Forrester Research, "TEI of Checkmarx," 2024.197 days between vulnerability introduction and discovery.
Verizon DBIR 2023 surfaced the median time between vulnerability introduction and discovery is 197 days. CI/CD scanning that runs on PR open catches new introductions - but misses vulnerabilities already in the codebase.
Verizon, Data Breach Investigations Report 2023.AppSec tool sprawl is a platform maintenance burden.
Most organizations run 3-5 separate AppSec tools: SAST, SCA, container scanning, IaC scanning, and secret detection - each with its own integration. Teams who consolidated AppSec tooling recovered 85% of AppSec team efficiency.
Forrester Research, "TEI of Veracode," 2024.Platform-native security that closes its own issues
Issues that close, not accumulate
- Hyrax integrates into GitHub as a native check run - issues surface and ship as pull requests in the same workflow
- Every issue becomes a PR; the developer reviews and merges, same as any other change
- No separate dashboard to monitor, no triage queue to manage
Continuous scanning, not PR-triggered
- Hyrax scans the full codebase continuously - not only on PR open events
- Discovery and Audit workflows run independently of CI/CD triggers
- Issues surface when they're introduced - not 197 days later at a quarterly pentest
Single integration point, surface through merge
- One GitHub App installation - no per-tool webhook configuration
- Discovery profiles your codebase patterns automatically
- Clear pricing: free to start, $30/user/mo with $30 of monthly credits per user
How Hyrax fits your existing platform
| Platform surface | Typical AppSec tool | Hyrax |
|---|---|---|
| CI/CD pipeline | Custom webhook config, scanner step, issue export | Native GitHub App - installs in one click |
| Ticketing | Manual issue-to-ticket creation or Jira webhook | Linear lifecycle closure built in |
| PR workflow | Developers receive issues as PR comments, apply changes manually | Hyrax opens PRs autonomously - engineers approve and merge |
| PR review | Manual review queues, security team ownership | Automated review on every push - blocks merge on must-resolve |
| Audit trail | Issue in scanner dashboard, PR in GitHub, ticket in Jira | Single PR chain: issue ID, resolve diff, test results, approver |
Common questions
from platform teams
We already have a SAST scanner in CI/CD. Why do we need Hyrax?
The scanner is the detection layer. Hyrax is the remediation layer. If your SAST issues are going into a queue and waiting for sprint allocation, you have detection but nothing that closes it.
How does Hyrax affect our existing CI/CD pipeline?
Hyrax runs as a GitHub App alongside your existing pipeline. It doesn't replace CI/CD steps - it runs independently and opens PRs for issues it executes.
We self-host. Does Hyrax support that?
Hyrax runs AI inference on AWS Bedrock. Code is processed securely and never used for model training. The GitHub App requires outbound access to GitHub's API.
What's the pricing model?
Free gives every workspace full access with a $30 starter credit and $10/month ongoing. Paid is $30 per user per month, and each paid user gets $30/month of credits. Credits cover compute cost.